Horror Movie Reviews
More Details...Price: $19.95 |
Title: I'll Bury You Tomorrow (2005) |
|
Review of I'll Bury You Tomorrow
No Review at this Current Time
[ Back to Homepage | Back to Horror Movie Reviews Index ]
HellHorror.com not responsible for reviews/comments and they may be removed at any time.
Submit Comment
Login / Join/Register for a free account
Comments for I'll Bury You Tomorrow
- Posted on 2008-05-31
This is great!
Saw this one a while back. I see it's now been given a new release courtesy of Redemption, (in UK) but this is the one that I saw, with the eye on the cover and a 'nice' picure on the back of the dvd sleeve! ;-)
It concerns Dolores, a lady who has a penchant for hot young guys. Or in this case, they are pretty cool young guys, as in stone cold dead.
I love this movie. It is so wild and outrageous in its subject matter. There's not many movies where necrophilia is dealt with, at least not as a kind of love story. Makes me wonder if they got the idea from the wellknown (in some quarters) necrophiliac girl, Karen Greenlee. - She got jobs in an undertakers because of her 'passions' and she got found out when she stole the body of an 18 year old boy and took it home with her to sleep with and make love to for a few days, something that Dolores does in this movie, so probably it is based on that case, because the similarity is so great to what actually happened in real life. I don't agree at all with the bad review, the movie is not badly made or badly acted. It had a lovely video nasty type of feel to it, I had to check to see when it was made as I wondered at first if it was one of the banned movies from the 1980's video nasty controversy in the UK where everything got a bit mad for a while and horror fans were very hard done by indeed! But no, it's a comparatively recent movie but has that rather obscure and 'far back in time' atmosphere that some of the best of the so-called 'nasties' had. - Oh for the heady days of the video boom when there was no rating system and just about anything could get released onto an unsuspecting, but hungry for more, video market! Unfortunately, most of them passed me by as I didn't have a VCR in those days and by the time I did get one, most of the best had been banned anyway, but I've since caught up with most of them, I'm pleased to say, and some of them are pretty dire and not really worth watching and quite why they were banned in the first place is beyond my comprehension, as so many of them are very tame, (not to mention lame!) but if this had been one of them, then it would have been one of the greats, but instead, it's made long after that time, so cudos to the makers for being able to create that wonderful atmosphere of a genuine video nasty! I wish there were more like this one. It's great!
Score: 5
- Posted on 2008-05-28
Tremendous Beginning
Bizarre, bloody, twisted, creepy and throughly original, IBYT is an extraordinary beginning for Alan Rowe Kelly and his crew of inde lunatics. It is a pity the film was low-budget, but they did a lot with only a little, which is the true spirit independent film making, i.e. spitting into the eye of the Hollywood machine.
I eagerly look forward to their next production.
Score: 4
- Posted on 2007-11-11
I'll bury dis now.
What, are all the positive reviews here from friends of those involved? Must be. This movie has the production values of a porn flick and is so much less interesting.
Here's what I thought in a nutshell: I looked forward to pausing the movie so I could tend to my LAUNDRY.
Score: 2
- Posted on 2007-05-09
not a delusion of grandeur
We should support ultra-low-budget efforts such as this. Major kudos to Mr. Jerry Murdock for a terrific bit of acting. Writer/director/gore effects wiz Alan Rowe Kelly shows tremendous promise. You guys are going places, the talent is there.
The weaknesses, as I saw them, and it's not easy critcizing something as low-budget as this, but I feel a certain responsibility: I realize it was shot on video, still, so much of the footage looked washed out. And this was something I didn't get, because it is so easy these days to get great looking footage with just about any (relatively inexpensive) SD camcorder, etc.
Secondly: the lead who played Dolores: just awful, so weak in fact that she hurt what could have been a horror classic. This film could have used someone better suited and convincing, someone who understands that LESS IS MORE, someone who undestands that yelling does not necessarily translate as deep-rooted rage ( there is more to it than that) someone with a degree of charisma and screen presence, etc.
It pains me to knock something that was made for next-to-nothing, still...if we are going to be helpful in any way, things ought to be pointed out: the good--as well as the other.
Lastly, the director also appears in the film as one of the characters. I say, okay, if you're someone like Eastwood, who can afford to have an army of crew people watching the actors to make sure no one steps out of frame and that things go the way they should...but when you cannot afford help of this caliber, it really isn't worth it--because your project will ultimately suffer as a result.
As I said: the guy can write, he can direct; the talent is there. Horror fans like to complain about all the remakes we are being subjected to... Well, here is something original. Get it. Rent it. Buy it. Support the indies, support hard-working creative types with solid potential like Alan Rowe Kelly and Jerry Murdock.
Score: 4 - Posted on 2007-03-25
A Masterpiece? Really?
I wish I could give this two and a half stars because I feel like it wasn't a total waste of time. I enjoy low budget horror films but to call this a masterpiece is going a bit too far I think. It kept losing my attention on and off throughout whole thing. Comparing it to the films of Dario Argento and Mario Bava is hard to swallow too. It is what it is. A low budget American horror flick that's only good as mindless entertainment. I'd suggest that low-budget horror fans give it a rent and make up their own minds.
Score: 2