Horror Movie Reviews

More Details... Price: $12.98

Title: A Sound of Thunder (Widescreen Edition) (2006) Starring: Armin Rohde, Heike Makatsch, Jemima Rooper, David Oyelowo, and Wilfried Hochholdinger Director: Peter Hyams Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested) Runtime: 110 minutes Avg. Score: 3 Submit Comment Hits: 9

Review of A Sound of Thunder (Widescreen Edition)

[ Back to Homepage | Back to Horror Movie Reviews Index ]

HellHorror.com not responsible for reviews/comments and they may be removed at any time.

Submit Comment

Comments for A Sound of Thunder (Widescreen Edition)

• Posted on 2008-06-24
  Ok, Lots of fun, CGI is bad.
  
  This movie was pretty good for what it was. I am sure if the company had more money they could have come up with a lot better looking story. What they couldnt come up with is a better story. It was pretty good. I feel Ray would have been pleased with the result. I mean the story is what drives the talk not the pretty pictures. They serve as a backdrop. Seriously, if you want to do better, call a production company, have them set you up with 100 million dollars and knock yourself out. Other then that these people have to deal with what they have and do the best they can. I will admit, the nitrogen guns were pretty cool.
  Score: 3
• Posted on 2008-06-23
  Plot holes beyond scope
  
  Plot hole to destroy the ENTIRE Movie
  Here it is. They go back in time. One creature is accidentally killed. Causing this WHOLE movie to go thru it's plot. But consider this, in the movie, There is a Volcano exploding with pyro fall and the works and it blasts thru the area in question where this creature was killed. Considering what this one creature is that got killed, there is no way in hell that creature could survive or any offspring to survive after the volcano hit that area only minutes after future people leave. That's it, movie is game over. The plot is gone, destroyed. Come one director You didn't see that coming? I don't blame anyone but the writers who thought this up, the rest of the people did the best they could but you can't beat bad writing like this.
  Score: 3
• Posted on 2008-06-23
  Those that rate at 1 or 2 must only watch block busters
  
  This movie was exactly what I would expect for a regular Sci-Fi video, or made for TV or B movie. I'm guessing that all those those who rated this video as 1 or 2 are the type of movie renter who only picks from the new releases or top picks video sections at the rental store.
  
  The CGI was good for a low budget and the sets were good. The acting was OK not great but better than I have seen on some enjoyable Sci-Fi that that I have watched. The movie did just as good at following the book as most block busters. If you are a REAL SCI-FI WATCHER (not a Block Buster only viewer) THAN THIS MOVIE WILL BE WORTH THE TIME.
  
  P.S. I hate the fact that most movie rental places put Sci-Fi together with Horror, can they really not tell the difference???
  
  Score: 4
• Posted on 2008-06-22
  Good popcorn movie
  
  O.K. The special effects could have been better, but I did not have as much of a problem as many of the negative critics. For one thing, it's SCIENCE FICTION!! Hard to apply 2008 science to it. The acting was O.K. Yeah, nothing special. Did have quite a bit of action to it. Weird creatures?... Watch some of the National Geographic documentaries on deep sea creatures.It did hold my interest, and I am a big fan of Sci-Fi.
  Score: 3
• Posted on 2008-06-22
  I loved this movie!
  
  I'm a huge sci fi / fantasy fan and I love time travel movies. I'm also really into non-mainstream movies and independent films. I know this movie didn't get very good reviews overall, but for me personally - well, simply, I disagree! It is one of my favorite movies! I highly recommend it, especially if you are into this type of genre.
  Score: 5