Horror Book Reviews
More Details...Price: $26.95 |
Title: Son of a Witch: A Novel |
|
Review of Son of a Witch: A Novel
The long-anticipated sequel to the million-copy bestselling novel Wicked
Ten years after the publication of Wicked, beloved novelist Gregory Maguire returns at last to the land of Oz. There he introduces us to Liir, an adolescent boy last seen hiding in the shadows of the castle after Dorothy did in the Witch. Bruised, comatose, and left for dead in a gully, Liir is shattered in spirit as well as in form. But he is tended at the Cloister of Saint Glinda by the silent novice called Candle, who wills him back to life with her musical gifts.
What dark force left Liir in this condition? Is he really Elphaba's son? He has her broom and her cape -- but what of her powers? Can he find his supposed half-sister, Nor, last seen in the forbidding prison, Southstairs? Can he fulfill the last wishes of a dying princess? In an Oz that, since the Wizard's departure, is under new and dangerous management, can Liir keep his head down long enough to grow up?
For the countless fans who have been dazzled and entranced by Maguire's Oz, Son of a Witch is the rich reward they have awaited so long.
Product Description
[ Back to Homepage | Back to Horror Movie Reviews Index ]
HellHorror.com not responsible for reviews/comments and they may be removed at any time.
Submit Comment
Login / Join/Register for a free account
Comments for Son of a Witch: A Novel
- Posted on 2008-07-05
Very interesting
This book is as much a sequel as a side story. Also clearly this is NOT the last in the sequence. The author leaves us with a nice cliffhanger or two. The story is about Liir, probable son of the "Wicked" Witch. Now regarded as a great heroine by many in Oz.
The way the author takes the story with such a different spin is great. The Lion, Tinman and Scarecrow are shown as petty, and childish.
I gave this a 4 because while a good story it is rather slow in the middle. By the way if you have not read the original wizard of Oz and perhaps one or two other original OZ books AND Wicked you will be completely lost. The book spends alomost no time explaining what has gone before.
Score: 4
- Posted on 2008-06-15
Not as good as "Wicked"
I read "Wicked" because of the really cool billboard for the musical that I saw in LAX. Elphaba was a person full of passion and tragedy and an imminently lovable character. Unfortunately in the sequal, Liir is not. "Son of a Witch" is much more existentialist than "Wicked", and it is hard to find out what is the point - maybe this is the point.
Score: 4 - Posted on 2008-06-14
Nice book
Came right on time, excellent condition (new).
The only thing I suggest is wrapping better the books, just a cardboard piece and plastic doesn't do it as expected.
Score: 5
- Posted on 2008-05-26
Unnecessary Sequel
Warning: Some spoilers
Is this really the best Maguire could do?
This novel simply didn't need to be written. I didn't find it as oppressively boring as some people did--it wasn't painful to finish--but neither did it keep me turning pages. The main problem is simply that there's no story. Oh, things happen, but a series of vaguely interconnected events do not make a story. A story is a coherent whole. You can't take out a piece without the entire thing falling apart. I feel like I could have taken three random chapters out of this book, and it wouldn't have made much difference. Might even improve it, since the novel is ridiculously slow in parts. The narrative is frequently clumsy, with Maguire--a seasoned writer--making the sort of mistakes a novice would make. Exposition is delivered in clumsy chunks of internal monologue...and half the time, it's exposition we don't even need. I got the sense he was just trying to fill as many pages as he could. There's no way this book ever would have been published if Wicked had not been so wildly successful.
I liked Wicked. It wasn't perfect, but it was new, innovative and filled with gorgeous prose and characters who--despite their strangeness--felt like real people. Son of a Witch feels as though it was written by a different person...like an exceptionally long piece of fanfiction. Even familiar characters don't feel the same. For instance--in Wicked, Dorothy was earnest, kind, and naive. In Son of a Witch, she alternates between postmodern cynicism and acting like a halfwit, spouting random nonsense.
Liir seems to have no defining characteristics and no coherent internal life. He starts to do something, then gives up or loses interest, starts to do something else, et cetera. First he's looking for Nor, then when he can't find her immediately, he joins the army, then when that doesn't work out, he goes back home, and then decides to go to the Bird conference...and so on. He wanders around Oz with no clear goals, and does a few inexplicable, contemptible things which make him difficult to sympathize with. A character doesn't have to be a driven, Type A overachiever in order to be interesting, but they have to WANT something. Liir doesn't want anything in particular. I felt like he was just passing time, and as a result, whenever I picked up the book, I felt like I was just passing time, too. I didn't feel like I was being taken on a journey, I felt like I was just kind of wandering through a place with interesting scenery. And interesting scenery is not enough to hold up a novel.
Trism initially seemed like a cool character. I mean, he can hypnotize dragons with his voice! But somehow, Maguire managed to make him boring, too. We never actually SEE him controlling any dragons, we just hear about it. And then he hooks up with Liir. Eh? Where did that come from? It's not the homosexuality per se that bothered me--people can swing both ways, after all--but the way it seemed to come out of nowhere. There's zero sexual tension, no sense of an attraction building between them, and no emotional connection whatsoever. And the actual sex is so vaguely described that (as one reviewer put it) you could blink and miss the fact that it happened, leaving me to wonder why Maguire even bothered to include this relationship. Like everything else in the novel, it just kind of happens.
In short, don't buy this book unless you have a lot of time on your hands. If you're not expecting much and just want to keep your mind occupied for awhile, it's not an unpleasant read, but as a sequel to Wicked, it falls far short.
Score: 2
- Posted on 2008-05-25
Entertaining
I really did not think I was going to like this book, The first chapter started out too violent. I am glad that I kept reading. I read it within a week of reading Wicked, and I really enjoyed it. It was great having some of the OZ characters, that I was familiar with, along with new charters. Wicked was different, a little strange because you know the fate of Elphaba. THere was more suspense in this one. I plan on reading more of this authors books, and well as the original OZ stories.
Score: 4